NAUN offers consistently high quality, line by line, thorough, rigorous, strict peer review process and very high editorial standards of care to its authors and readers. This page contains some comments from just a few of our authors about their experience of NAUN to check if each accepted paper by the Editors-in-Chief is backed by a minimum of 3 reviewers' positive recommendation. Download this Certification - Evaluation of the Review Process from here: CERTIFICATION.docx If some authors feel that have not received, at least, 3 positive opinions from 3 independent reviewers, they should not sign this form. All the Certifications - Evaluations of the Review Process for each paper after April 22, 2020 are available to everybody after a simple request by email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Author TestimonialsI received comments from 3 reviewers that helped me to improve my paper significantly. Really, after the revision taking into account Reviewer's comments, I see that my manuscript became better and stronger. Thanks a lot to dear Reviewers! In NAUN Journals, the Editor Team responds to your emails and questions, reports the results of the peer review process in time and sends you these valuable comments. One always feels from the NAUN team a collegial, academic attitude along with high professionalism, rigorous peer review by many reviewers and objectivity. I’m more than eager to continue working with NAUN Journals in the future. Thank you for your cooperation!
Prof. Marina Batova
Military University of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia,
Author TestimonialsMy comments to the peer-review process are listed below, The review process was rapid while rigorous. The editors administered the review process in a strict manner, corresponded with the authors promptly, and timely notified the acceptance of an article. Specifically, the interval between my first submission and the time to receive the first-round reviewers’ comments was only 21 days! More importantly, any paper submitted to NAUN would be checked for plagiarism by Turnitin before peer-review to assure academic ethics. From my perspective, the reviewers’ concerns inspired me to further polish the article in the hope of a comprehensive and scientific presentation of the research. Furthermore, we were told by NAUN that our revised article would not be accepted until the satisfaction of reviewers and EIC regarding peer-review comments, contributing to the fairness of publication. In this way, I highly recommend colleagues and scholars choose NAUN for the publication of their innovative research and findings.
Prof. Ming Xiang
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Author TestimonialsIt was a great experience to have our paper published in the International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It was a remarkable reviewing process by having important and valuable comments from three reviewers. The reviewing duration was convenient and very professional. We highly recommend NAUN publisher for future publication. Final production was excellent. Regards
Dr. Mazhar AL-Zoubi
Assistant Dean of Alumni, Research and International Projects
Assoc. Prof. Molecular and Experimental Oncology and Biochemistry
Fellow in Responsible Conduct of Research/University of California San Diego
Department of Basic Medical Sciences/Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan
Author TestimonialsThe review process in NAUN Journals is very strong and really very professional. It is fair and we received relevant and valuable comments. Finaly, we are interested in following topic, it could be interesting for you and your journal (International Journal of Education and Information Technologies): Application of Modern Information Tools in Logistics and Transport. Best Regards
Prof. Martin Vlkovsky
University of Defence in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Author TestimonialsI declare, I confirm, I certify and I sign that I received substantial, important, line by line peer review with several and substantial comments, important remarks and hints from, at least, 3 Reviewers and the Assistant Editor for my paper: Big Data Classification for the Analysis MEL Scale Features using KNN parameterization with Authors: Ruslan Skuratovskii and Volodymyr Osadchyy I would like to thank all the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts towards improving our manuscript. We revised the manuscript with special attention to the comments that we received from, at least, 3 reviewers that they were experts, specialists in the area of my paper. I declare, confirm, certify and sign that NAUN checked my paper for possible plagiarism by Turnitin and my paper was found without plagiarism or self- plagiarism by Turnitin.
Prof. Ruslan Skuratovskii
Igor Sikorsky Kiev Polytechnic Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
Tel.: +38 073 073 93 65
Author TestimonialsI am glad that I published one of my good papers in your journals. I made the significant improvements that the reviewers proposed on the paper in order to submit the final version. I am glad that the paper will be published in this journal soon and I thank the Editor-inChief, Associate Editor and the team of 3 reviewers
Prof. Wachirarak Orosram
Buriram Rajabhat University, Buriram Country, Thailand
Author TestimonialsI recommend the NAUN Journals with the very strict and professional review I also declare, confirm, certify and sign that that I have made all the changes, modifications, additions, studies, corrections asked by the reviewers and I have fully complied with their instructions. I also understand that before the publication the 3 ( or more than 3) reviewers will check my paper to see if all the changes, modifications, additions, studies, corrections etc have been done and I authorize the NAUN to publish my paper or to reject my paper even in the 2nd round of peer review or to continue with an additional round of peer review.
Prof. Ming Xiang
Institution: School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Tel.: +86 13074661972
Author TestimonialsI recommend my colleagues to publish their works in the NAUN journals. It should be noted the excellent organization of the review process. Reviewers promptly sent reviews that were written clearly and contained reasonable suggestions for corrections. Given the fact that the publication was absolutely free for authors, we can evaluate the work of the publishing house team in the highest possible way. I hope that our efforts will further increase the rating of these publications, and readers will find only high-quality scientific material in them
Prof. Dmitry A. Tarasov
Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Tel.: +7 (343) 3754630