26d1c6be-5010-4bbe-b688-38ea4033e8b920220121063522305naun:naunmdt@crossref.orgMDT DepositInternational Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing1998-446410.46300/9106http://www.naun.org/cms.action?id=30291720221720221610.46300/9106.2022.16https://npublications.com/journals/circuitssystemssignal/2022.phpXingangWangSchool of Business,Yulin Normal University,Yulin537000, ChinaShideOuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics,Yulin Normal University,Yulin537000, ChinaShangzhiYueCollege of Economy and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin154000, ChinaIn the context of supply-side structual reform, the marketization of forest ecological compensation is an inevitable requirement under the market economy. The forest health-cultivation industry, which explores the new method to utilize the forestry resources, is a new direction of forestry firms and is the production of supply-side structural reform. From the perspective of forest health-cultivation industry, this essay explores the possibility of the marketization of forest ecological compensation based on forest health-cultivation industry, and predicts the willingness of people to pay for the ecological service by using the original number of tourists in forestry tourism and leisure industry tourism between 2010 and 2015 and adopting the improved GM (1,1) model. The result shows that people’s willingness is increasing. It is predicted that, by 2023, the number of tourists in forestry tourism and leisure industry tourism will reach 8.98 billion. The development of forest health-cultivation industry has introduced the market mechanism for forestry development, which makes up for the deficiency of the existing compensation mechanism characterized by low compensation standards and single channel of funding. The increase of people’s demand for ecological tourism and the boom of forest health-cultivation industry which provide a new opportunity for the marketization and diversification of forest ecological compensation mechanism.1122022112202229830436https://npublications.com/journals/circuitssystemssignal/2022/a722005-036(2022).pdf10.46300/9106.2022.16.36https://npublications.com/journals/circuitssystemssignal/2022/a722005-036(2022).pdfX.Y. Cao, Y.C.Liu.“Analysis on the Marketization Compensation Approaches of Forest Ecological Benefits in China ”Forestry Economic Issues, 2011, 31(1):16-19 Q.J. Wang, S.Q. Cai.“Legal Research on Ecological Compensation Mechanism” Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2006, (07): 73-80. G.D. Xie, S.Y. Cao.“The Status and Trend of the Development of Ecological Compensation Mechanism ”Enterprise Economy,2016,(04):32-35. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011S.Engel, S.Pagiola, etc,“Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues” Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):663-674. X.Y. Cao,Y.C. Liu.“Analysis on Marketization Compensation Approaches of Forest Ecological Benefits in China” Forestry Economic Issues, 2011, 31 (1): 16-19. Y.Li,“Research on Marketization of Forest Ecological Benefit Compensation” Science and Technology Outlook, 2016, 26 (11), 72-72. S.J.Wang,Y.Jiao,“Foreign Forest Ecological Benefits Compensation System and Its Reference”Eco-economics, 2011, (01): 69-73. S.l.Deng,“Theoretical Research and Practice of Forest Health”World Forestry Research, 2016,29 (06): 1-6. 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006G.V.Hecken, J. Bastiaensen,“Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? ”A political view” Environmental Science and Policy, 13 (2010), pp. 785-792 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002G.-G.M,etc,“How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? ”Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development, 2005, 33(9):1511-1527. W.J. Li,F,etc,“Research Status and Prospect of Forest Ecological Benefit Compensation”Journal of Natural Resources, 2006 (05): 677-688. H.Pan,X.Xu,“Review of Research on Market Mechanism of Investment and Financing for Ecological Compensation ”Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2016,16 (01): 59-64. Y.Y. Chen,“Marketization Path and Countermeasures of Ecological Compensation Mechanism in the New Era ”Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2018,33 (03): 110-115. H.J.Wu, X.Q. Dan,etc,“Forest well-being: concept, product type and development path”Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37 (07): 2159 -2169. S.Q.Zhang,“Thinking about Developing Forest Recreation Industry and Promoting Modern Forestry Transformation and Upgrade ”Forestry Economy, 2018,40 (08): 42-46. G.F. Xu,etc.“What is forest recreation?——Thinking based on the integration of forest multifunctionality and related business formats”Forestry Economy, 2018,40 (08): 58-60 + 103. B.P.Sun,““Forest well-being” is a new format and model of China's big health industry” Commercial Culture, 2015 (22): 82-83. 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.04.010Y.Oe,etc.“Evaluating the relaxation effects of emerging forest-therapy tourism: A multidisciplinary approach” Tourism Management, 2017, 62:322-334. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002G.-G.M,etc,“How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America”World Development, 2005, 33(9):1511-1527. S. F. Liu,J.l. Deng,“Application scope of GM (1,1) model” Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2000, (05): 121-124. J. Li,“China's New Industry of Forest Rehabilitation and Health”China Forestry Industry, 2017 (3): 21-22. G.D.Xie,S.Y.Cao,et al. “The status and trends of ecological compensation in China”Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6 (6): 355-362.